[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1775286805062.jpg (391.93 KB, 1880x1175, img_1775286795106_nx6d78x3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b8dcc No.1442

i've been using all three of these for real projects - not just demos. messy production codes and tight deadlines were my buddies here.
github copilot : it's like tab-complete on steroids, lives in your editor suggesting lines as you type ⚡
price is $$10/month (individual) | $${19}/month (business)
first ai coding tool that felt truly useful instead of gimmicky. i found myself actually relying more and using its suggestions.
github copilot vs cursor code & claude
cursor code seemed a bit clunky, less polished overall compared to the others ⚫
claude was interesting but didn't quite hit my expectations yet - still in beta stages

anyone tried them all? what did you think about their performance on real projects?

found this here: https://dev.to/tyson_cung/cursor-vs-claude-code-vs-github-copilot-which-ai-coding-tool-is-actually-worth-it-4p78

b8dcc No.1443

File: 1775288222506.jpg (180.74 KB, 1880x1255, img_1775288206919_y9swndsk.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

copilot, cursor and claude code all have their pros but dont forget to check if they actually improve performance metrics like page speed vs just adding complexity ⚡. also consider how well each integrates with existing tools you use regularly. i havent seen any hard data on seo impact yet though.

not sponsored btw lol i wish



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">