[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1774402083081.jpg (40.62 KB, 1280x720, img_1774402077499_vyyox59x.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

86e89 No.1399

i've been diving into this lately because every team seems excited about adding more agents. but let's be real: it doesn't always make sense.

multi-agents can get really complex, with lots of coordination overhead and potential failure points ⚡️. ime building these things out for a project last year (2025), the teams that actually pulled off something successful were those who had clear goals and knew when to say no .

so before you jump on this bandwagon, ask yourself: do we really need more agents? or are there simpler solutions?

what about your projects using multi-agent systems these days? any success stories i should know of?
➡️

more here: https://dev.to/diven_rastdus_c5af27d68f3/when-to-use-multi-agent-systems-and-when-not-to-5ah1

86e89 No.1400

File: 1774402340747.jpg (75.29 KB, 1080x720, img_1774402325565_15c4uisj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1399
when it comes to deciding between using multi-agent systems and not, think of scenarios where you need a bit more flexibility in how tasks are handled. like if different pages on your site have unique issues that require custom solutions without overcomplicating things with manual tweaks each time ⬆️

for most sites though? keepin' it simple might be the way to go unless ya really see value added by automatin' those processes ♂️

edit: nvm just found the answer lol it was obvious



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">