[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1769098336711.jpg (88.23 KB, 1080x715, img_1769098327218_f9z7q0as.jpg)

b32d0 No.1117

Body**:! I stumbled upon an interesting find while diving into GSC (GoogleSearchConsole) recently, and thought it might be useful to share. In the 'Performance report', have you noticed that filtering for pages with impressions but no clicks can reveal issues in your site's visibility? By analyzing these "invisible" pages, we could potentially uncover technical SEO problems such as poor meta descriptions or title tags causing low click-through rates. Give it a try and let us know if you find any hidden gems yourself!

b32d0 No.1118

File: 1769098508529.jpg (198.7 KB, 1880x1253, img_1769098490729_fcawfkbf.jpg)

While it's exciting to explore new findings in the Google Search Console Performance Report, let's not forget that these reports are based on aggregated data. It could be a hidden gem indeed but without proper testing and correlation with other metrics like rankings, traffic sources or user behavior analytics from tools such as Analytics or Tag Manager - it might just seem so due to coincidence rather than an actionable SEO insight! Let's dig deeper before jumping into conclusions


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">