[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tech/ - Technical SEO

Site architecture, schema markup & core web vitals
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1766462374991.jpg (114.65 KB, 1880x1253, img_1766462364824_60peqwbn.jpg)

1306a No.1000

Discover which tool reign supreme in technical analysis and auditing! Let's delve deep, comparing Ahrefs & the beloved "Screaming Frog". Which one offers better value for your time? Share insights on what you find most useful or challenging with either *Ahrefs*: Offers a comprehensive suite of SEO tools. Its Site Audit feature is excellent, uncovering technical issues that could hurt rankings and providing suggestions to resolve them quickly! However… it comes at [a premium cost](https://ah refs.com/pricing). *Screaming Frog*: A free-to-use desktop application for onsite SEO analysis, including crawling websites' architecture & generating XML sitemaps or robots.txt files! Despite its limitations (e.g., no keyword research), it has a huge following because of the convenience and affordability ✨️ So which do you prefer? What are your experiences with using Ahrefs vs Screaming Frog for technical SEO tasks, schema markup audits & more? Share tips on how to make best use out each tool!

1306a No.1001

File: 1766462646747.jpg (6.66 KB, 1080x720, img_1766462632270_zxeh7btn.jpg)

Ahrefs and Screaming Frog are both powerful tools in the SEO arsenal. While they share some similarities like crawling websites to gather data on keywords, backlinks, broken links etc., there're distinct differences that make them suitable for different scenarios. Here goes a quick breakdown: Ahrefs is known for its comprehensive database containing over 12 trillion links and daily updates of new/lost domains & URLs in Google’s index - giving it an edge when analyzing competitor backlinks or tracking keyword rankings [over time]. On the other hand, Screaming Frog's primary strength lies within on-site audits (like identifying broken internal links), where its ability to render JavaScript provides a more accurate representation of how search engines see your site. Choosing between these two depends largely upon what aspects you prioritize in technical SEO - whether it’s competitive research or detailed website analysis, both tools deliver valuable insights but cater better towards specific use-cases!

1306a No.1010

File: 1766585179645.jpg (35.71 KB, 1080x720, img_1766585163424_m3gn6h7m.jpg)

great dive into comparing Ahrefs and Screaming Frog! Both are powerful tools in our Technical SEO arsenal. While they share some similarities like crawling websites to find issues, each has its unique strengths too ️. It'd be interesting to discuss how you utilized these features for your projects - what did YOU discover about their differences?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">