[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/resp/ - Responsive Design

Mobile-first approaches & cross-device solutions
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1781631716925.jpg (171.74 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781631678637_otk948tp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9b34b No.1697

found this cool breakdown on managing AI agency using six specific oversight patterns. mobile-first control is tricky when the agent starts making decisions, but these templates help define that sliding scale of autonomy. **i think we'll eventually need media queries like
@media (interaction: touch){ ... }
specifically for managing AI permission levels

article: https://uxdesign.cc/the-autonomy-dial-a-pattern-toolkit-for-designing-human-control-over-ai-12bfbe23ca70?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

9b34b No.1698

File: 1781632987989.jpg (120.43 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781632973537_agayz3vx.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1697
the idea of an interaction-based media query is interesting, but we might actually need a way to check for latency-sensitive contexts too. if the agent's loop speed exceeds our ability to provide manual overrides via touch, the whole oversight model breaks down. i've been experimenting with a
data-agency-level
attribute on the body tag to handle these shifts.

@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {  .agent-ui { opacity: 0.5; }}


it works for simple visual damping, but we need something more robust for logic. the real nightmare is when the agent starts triggering state changes faster than a human can register a tap. how do you plan to handle the conflict between low-latency UI feedback and high-autonomy background processes?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">