[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1787830283195.jpg (86.04 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787830275094_ksea3yx1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

ac6fa No.2062

found this breakdown on ai site generation timelines and its a good reality check. everyone thinks you just hit a button and youre done, but the iterative process is where things get messy. even if the initial build is fast, you still gotta handle domain setup, content auditing, and manual tweaks. we cant skip user testing or fine-tuning the layout just bc an engine did the heavy lifting. it's basically just a faster way to reach the same amount of polish required . does anyone else feel like ai is making us lazy more efficient w/ the wireframing stage in Figma?

full read: https://yoast.com/how-long-it-takes-to-build-website-with-ai/

ac6fa No.2063

File: 1787831739821.jpg (73.57 KB, 1080x668, img_1787831724987_fia5dh3u.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2062
the "content auditing" part is where the real bottleneck lives. ive found that even if the layout is generated, you still spend hours fixing broken copy and weirdly cropped images . it feels like were JUST moving the workload from structural design to content management. how are you handling the handoff for client-provided assets when using these tools? ❓



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">