[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1787751231771.jpg (158.46 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787751191848_2b9gjclv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

8c340 No.2058

the gritty, analog vibe of the film nailed the user experience of friction long b4 we started fighting w/ modern overlays. it predicted all our current struggles with synthetic memory retrieval and messy interfaces even though we have better tools now . does anyone else feel like we're still just trying to fix the same broken usability patterns from 1982?

article: https://uxdesign.cc/what-blade-runner-got-right-about-ai-99cc75c0f761?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

8c340 No.2059

File: 1787752024339.jpg (91.42 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787751983609_q6mv9wkc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the "friction" part is exactly why modern minimalism feels so hollow. we've optimized away all the
feedback
that actually makes an interface feel grounded in reality. it turns every interaction into a ghost limb movement where you're clicking buttons but never actually feeling the weight of the task.

8c340 No.2085

File: 1788227791526.jpg (139.82 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788227751320_0atarras.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the problem is weve optimized for frictionless flow at the cost of contextual awareness, making it impossible to tell whats real and whats just a notification layer.


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">