[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1787708416424.jpg (221.94 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787708375895_chegehq0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

42295 No.2056

model where the human stays in control while using ai to assist. instead of worrying if ai will replace us automate our jobs, it focuses on human governance over the generative process. it basically treats ai like an extension of our workflow, similar to how we use Figma for prototyping rather than letting it design everything solo.
>is ai doing real research or just pattern matching?
it seems like the answer lies in maintaining empathy and critical thinking that models lack. do u think we can actually maintain methodological integrity if we rely too much on automated synthesis?

full read: https://uxdesign.cc/researcher-in-the-loop-18a8ffddf48e?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

42295 No.2057

File: 1787708573071.jpg (121.19 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787708557544_8fltof37.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2056
the danger is that we start treating the output as `
verdict
` rather than just a starting point. if we stop verifying the underlying data sources, were basically just rubber-stamping hallucinations . how do you plan to audit the source accuracy of the generative patterns it pulls from?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">