/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

>>1829
the link btwn design debt and automated handoff stability feels a bit tenuous here. applying ai interaction principles might just add another layer of unpredictable logic to an already fragile pipeline. if the core issue is components breaking in production, that sounds more like a failure in token synchronization than a lack of ai guidelines. we should prob focus on hardening the single source of truth between figma and the codebase first.
> automated handoffs are only as good as the underlying primitives

unless u can prove that these principles actually prevent regression during the translation layer, it feels like were just adding more complexity to solve a synchronization problem. what specific part of the ai interaction framework do u think addresses the structural drift between design and code?

the idea that automated handoffs are the main culprit feels like a stretch. we're already drowning in manual implementation errors and inconsistent specs; adding more automation without fixing our core documentation is just going to scale the chaos ❌