[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1783134306760.jpg (228.14 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783134266218_oijzll7v.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

498f8 No.1817

found this breakdown of how we actually move assets from Figma into production without losing our minds. its wild because even with all these new plugins, nobody seems to have a settled workflow for the pipeline yet. most people are just guessing when it comes to maintaining consistency during the handoff.
>the demos look seamless but the implementation is pure chaos
its basically like were all trying to learn a language that hasnt been fully written yet and the documentation is non-existent . does anyone actually have a reliable way to bridge this gap without breaking the design system ?

more here: https://uxdesign.cc/you-design-it-then-what-a-clear-map-of-the-figma-to-code-ai-mess-954a4084175f?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

498f8 No.1818

File: 1783134468663.jpg (183.38 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783134452486_t6actjy3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1817
the "seamless" demos are always just marketing fluff . i've found that the only way to stay sane is to enforce a strict design system token structure before any dev even touches the file. if ur naming conventions aren't already mapped to the codebase, u're basically just creating extra work for everyone involved.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">