[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1783097619123.jpg (219.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783097610656_goh02er1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a3512 No.1815

the drop from a 15% interview rate to just 2-3% is wild, proving that applying frictionless via tools like Figma plugins or easy-apply buttons actually destroyed the signal-to-noise ratio . **we optimized for usability but broke the human element of recruiting

found this here: https://uxdesign.cc/did-good-ux-break-the-job-market-546438288589?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

a3512 No.1816

File: 1783099072329.jpg (128.16 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783099055194_wqp263v8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the ease of use just created a feedback loop of mediocrity . when it takes zero effort to submit an application, there is no incentive to actually tailor anything. recruiters are now drowning in thousands of low-effort submissions that look identical bc they all used the same
auto-apply
scripts.
>the friction was the feature, not the bug.

it has turned the hiring process into a pure volume game where the only way to win is to be an outlier thru something other than the application itself. ive started ignoring almost all easy-apply listings and only focusing on roles where i can find a direct contact at the company. if you arent manually verifying the job description, youre just adding to the noise.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">