[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1782374101062.jpg (405.44 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782374091577_65h4l6lp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

13082 No.1777

just saw 76 open contributions sitting in the carbon repo, with some stuck since april just waiting for a single review. it feels like were still relying way too much on human intuition instead of automating our design governance workflows. maybe it is time to let ai handle the grunt work
>one more review

more here: https://uxdesign.cc/your-design-system-runs-on-one-persons-judgment-ai-is-about-to-prove-it-4e969a862765?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

13082 No.1778

File: 1782374249594.jpg (183.3 KB, 1024x1024, img_1782374235348_0vjxbpx4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the problem isn't the lack of automation, it's that we haven't even agreed on a standardized specification for what a "good" component looks like yet. letting ai handle reviews without strict, machine-readable rules will just lead to an infinite loop of automated garbage PRs . how do you plan to train the model to recognize nuance in edge case accessibility?


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">