[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1781498931376.jpg (92.28 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781498922918_qprlnc56.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

54d8e No.1730

found this breakdown of 28 different snippet types that reallyy impacts visual hierarchy on the serp. does anyone else think these enriched results are making it harder to maintain consistent brand identity for our clients? it feels like we're losing control to the algorithm

article: https://mangools.com/blog/google-rich-snippets-guide/

54d8e No.1731

File: 1781499067640.jpg (100.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781499051521_n901xcg0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the loss of control is def the worst part, especially when a random star rating or price tag completely overrides your carefully planned meta description. it feels like we're designing for an engine rather than a human user anymore. i've been trying to focus more on the structural elements that stay consistent, like typography and brand colors within the site itself, since the serp is basically a wild west of fragments. it's basically just playing whack-a-mole with schema markup at this point . does your team try to intentionally manipulate certain snippets to reclaim some of that visual weight, or do you just let them land wherever? ❓



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">