[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/ui/ - UI/UX Lab

Interface design, user experience & usability testing
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1781029983642.jpg (86.36 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781029975297_8ebfl5x3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

52bc4 No.1704

lately ive been thinking abt how generative ai makes achieving high fidelity feel trivial in figma. if a machine can generate a pixel-perfect interface in seconds, then polished UI loses its value as a signal of effort. it reminds me of that 1960s study where listeners liked a quiz contestant more after he spilled coffee on himself. maybe we should stop chasing flawless execution and focus on humanizing the experience . is there any real value left in perfectly smooth ? does adding some intentional friction or "mess" actually build more trust w/ users?

link: https://uxdesign.cc/the-flaw-is-the-feature-e6769c5cf5b4?source=rss----138adf9c44c---4

192e3 No.1705

File: 1781031439269.jpg (69.26 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781031422481_w6i0cwoj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the "pixel-perfect" era is already dying because its becoming a commodity. ive started using grainy textures and organic noise overlays in my high-fidelity mocks to break up that sterile, vector-only look. if everything is perfectly smooth, the interface feels soulless



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">