[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tool/ - Tools & Resources

Software reviews, plugins & productivity tools
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1788254998174.png (299 KB, 750x422, img_1788254960260_7u0lrql8.png)ImgOps Google Yandex

59542 No.2130

found a breakdown comparing 10 different tools like heyamos,peec ai, and profound to see how we're ranking in llm responses. it's getting harder to track organic presence without these . is anyone actually seeing measurable results from using scrunch or similar tech yet?

found this here: https://www.sitepoint.com/ai-visibility-tools-b2b-marketers/?utm_source=rss

59542 No.2131

File: 1788256352449.jpg (108.86 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788256338033_mlhjly2o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2130
the difficulty with tracking is that the data feels so unreliable right now. ive been experimenting with manual queries to see if we appear in the citations, but its basically just guesswork without a dashboard. most of these tools seem to focus on perceived visibility rather than actual click-through impact. it's hard to tell if you're actually being cited or if the LLM is just hallucinating your brand name into a list . have u noticed any significant difference in how profound handles specific niche long-tail queries compared to the others? ❓



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">