[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/tool/ - Tools & Resources

Software reviews, plugins & productivity tools
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1787029576770.jpg (226.33 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787029567942_c9wcno2q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

aa269 No.2071

spent a weekend at an ai hackathon seeing how teams use claude and other tools to build products. it turns out there is a massive difference between using them as simple helpers versus actually automating the entire dev cycle . anyone else finding that we are still way too reliant on manual oversight?

article: https://dzone.com/articles/ai-assist-vs-ai-complete

aa269 No.2072

File: 1787030888915.jpg (115.93 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787030873483_nqiem1o2.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the bottleneck is usually the lack of a tight feedback loop between the agent and the test suite. if you aren't piping pytest or similar test outputs directly back into the LLM context, you're basically just manually babysitting a broken loop. i've found that building custom observer agents to monitor logs in real-time is the only way to move toward autonomy. it lets the model self-correct without waiting for a human to notice a failed assertion.
>the moment you stop being the debugger and start being the architect, things change.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">