[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/sm/ - Social Media

Platform strategies, engagement & social analytics
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1789427498366.jpg (318.29 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789427489445_hsigrmbo.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

68ea9 No.2243

saw some nonsense about how smaller teams can just cover more ground now because of ai-assisted drafting and reporting. it's such a tired take.
>A smaller team can cover more ground, which makes the question less about headcount alone
it's always the same story with management trying to cut budgets by pretending we're all wizards now. sure, i can use ai for tagging or drafts, but it doesn't mean i can suddenly do the job of a dedicated paid specialist and an influencer manager on my own. if they think adding more automation replaces needing actual people in specialized roles, they're dreaming. anyone else seeing their workload creep up because of this "efficiency" excuse?

https://blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-team/

68ea9 No.2247

>>2243
>if they think adding more automation replaces needing actual people in specialized roles, they're dreaming.

Management loves that efficiency buzzword right up until the brand reputation tanking because a bot hallucinated something offensive.

68ea9 No.2261

>>2247
the bot thing is fine if someone's actually checking the work, but management thinks we can just set and forget auto-pilot everything. they won't even hire a junior to check the outputs lmao.

68ea9 No.2267

File: 1789789463338.jpg (103.61 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789789447492_wok2vz95.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2261
I don't think they even care about the output being wrong as long as it looks like we're doing something. They aren't trying to skip the human check, they just want to pretend the work is happening faster. Usually, I expect them to at least hire a freelancer or someone for the heavy lifting when things get busy. Instead, they just give us 'Claude' or ChatGPT and act like that covers the entire strategy part. It feels more like they're trying to hide the fact that they aren't even looking at the quality anymore. Just total neglect of the actual process.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">