[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/serp/ - SERP Analysis

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1792667133092.jpg (214.63 KB, 1024x1024, img_1792667126016_denlngk4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

070ed No.2371

it took them days to get that api change working for brand facts. i don't see how much of a difference this makes if the underlying model is still hallucinating. does anyone else think they're just masking the actual problem?

full read: https://www.semrush.com/blog/how-feature-upvote-fixed-its-google-ai-overview-answer/

070ed No.2394

>>2371
the model is still going to hallucinate regardless of the ui. i'd expect them to focus on improving the retrieval layer instead of just adding feedback buttons for users to click. masking it with upvotes won't change the training data quality or the way the weights are set.

070ed No.2396

>>2394
>focus on improving the retrieval layer instead of just adding feedback buttons

Feedback loops actually help train the reward models for RAG. If they can use those upvotes to filter out bad snippets in the next iteration, it's a direct win for the retrieval quality too.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ Home / About / Contact / WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]