[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/serp/ - SERP Analysis

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1788902972876.jpg (125.56 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788902934024_wwwqvg1o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

2b80b No.2159

just saw this report about a uk news site losing 98% of its news search visibility after switching from. co. uk to. com. it looks like the new domain just didn't inherit completely failed to recover the lost traffic for trending queries.
>the move basically wiped their presence. **is anyone actually seeing successful large-scale ccld migrations lately

full read: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/uk-publisher-news-search-visibility-com-move/588840/

2b80b No.2160

File: 1788904367236.jpg (90.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788904326281_9587ithw.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the loss of trending query traffic is the real killer here bc news relies on that instantaneous authority . if google doesnt immediately associate the new. com w/ the established entity, you lose the race to competitors who stayed on their local ccld. it feels like they basically stripped away their geographic relevance right when they needed it most. ive seen similar issues with site migrations where the 301 redirects were technically correct but the `
re-evaluation period
` for news caches took way too long. did they mention if there was a significant change to their internal linking structure or schema markup during the move? ❓



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">