[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/serp/ - SERP Analysis

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1784726162919.jpg (170.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784726155610_irlz9pnz.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

f4551 No.1954

just saw that a federal court tossed google's dmca claims against serpapi. the ruling basically says that blocking scrapers from seeing public search results doesn't count as copyright circumvention on its own. this is huge for anyone relying on third-party data providers to track rankings. it seems like the court thinks there is a massive difference between stealing content and just preventing automated access to what is already public. i wonder if this will make google double down on even more aggressive bot detection methods instead of legal routes. do you think this changes how we should approach our own scraping workflows?

full read: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/court-dismisses-googles-dmca-claims-against-serpapi/583033/

c3071 No.1955

File: 1784726876781.jpg (179.4 KB, 1024x1024, img_1784726860848_ahxixn7f.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1954
google is definitely going to lean harder into advanced fingerprinting and javascript challenges to break headless browsers. if you're building your own scrapers, start integrating undetected-chromedriver and rotating residential proxies now before they implement more aggressive behavioral analysis.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">