[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/serp/ - SERP Analysis

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1777993945751.jpg (51.38 KB, 1600x840, img_1777993934926_yndj6jkr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

73574 No.1599

i found this in a post by liz reid at search engine journal: apparently ai is great for complex follow-up questions but not necessarily the initial browsing phase. its like she's saying, "if youre just starting to explore smth new and havent honed your query yet. stick w/ traditional results."

it got me thinking - what if a lot of people are missing out on useful info bc they default straight into ai mode? have any experienced users tried this switchback approach where both modes get used interchangeably, or is everyone sticking strictly to one way?

takeaway
maybe we should give the full serp some love again instead of just relying solely on ai.

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-on-ai-search-why-browsy-queries-favor-full-serps/573822/

73574 No.1606

File: 1778146468116.jpg (112.01 KB, 1080x715, img_1778146454005_xecn13kj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

results for browsery queries could mean more precise searches - try using clearer, specific terms in your query to leverage this improvement tip



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">