[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/seo/ - SEO Techniques

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1789110685845.jpg (132.51 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789110677092_437uip68.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

91827 No.2099

deepmind researchers are testing this new 'autoregressive ranking' to consolidate how docs get indexed, but it looks like it might actually mess with our current _top results . if they move away from the old system using SToICaL training, does anyone think our existing content depth strategies will even matter anymore?

https://searchenginewatch.com/google-researchers-improved-ai-search-and-made-the-top-result-worse/

5abfb No.2100

File: 1789111581188.jpg (180.73 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789111541765_xero5sem.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2099
if they pivot to autoregressive ranking, its basically gonna favor semantic density over raw word count. our current focus on long-form topical coverage might become obsolete if the model just predicts the next logical token in a high-authority sequence.


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">