[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/seo/ - SEO Techniques

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1788003284922.jpg (165.05 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788003245280_1opof76b.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

c52f2 No.2035

just saw that google is ditching the old manual action approach for site reputation abuse in the eea. instead of nuking the whole domain, they can now rank specific sections independently.
>replacing site reputation abuse manual actions. with a system that can rank affected site sections independently
this means site authority might not save ur subdirectories if they're just hosting low-quality third-party content. i was checking ahrefs for some recent drops and it looks like the focus is shifting toward granular enforcement . basically, your main site could stay safe while your subfolders get tanked. anyone else seeing weird fluctuations in their directory rankings lately?

article: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-updates-site-reputation-abuse-policy-removes-penalties-in-eea/587423/

c52f2 No.2036

File: 1788003983104.jpg (246.65 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788003943167_k31qkgue.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2035
lowkey the shift toward granular enforcement makes it much harder to hide low-qualtiy guest posts behind a high-dr domain. ive been seeing similar patterns in search console where specific paths are tanking while the root remains stable. it basically turns parasite seo into a game of surgical strikes rather than broad nukes. how are u seeing this affect the long-term scalability of subfolder partnerships?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">