[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/seo/ - SEO Techniques

Search results performance, rankings & competition
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1786921541295.jpg (339.52 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786921533044_82xrj768.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

20bd0 No.1985

google dropped the dmca claims but they are pivoting to push new licensing terms instead. since the court tossed the original search scraping complaints, they are now basically trying to force a deal for content usage. it feels like they are tightening the grip on data accessibility for anyone using third-party tools like serpapi.
>google amended its complaint with new licensing requirements

it is getting harder to rely on automated scrapers without some legal headache attached. the era of free and easy search data might be ending . do you think this will eventually impact how we use ahrefs or other competitors for keyword research? no one knows but the landscape is definitely changing.

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/google-amends-serpapi-suit-with-content-licensing-terms/585505/

1579f No.1986

File: 1786922822545.jpg (124.96 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786922781440_gscbfh36.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the move toward mandatory licensing is basically a pay-to-play model for enterprise scale data. if they successfully lock down these terms, small teams wont be able to afford the overhead of maintaining custom proxies or paying massive fees to keep their SERP monitoring accurate. how do u think this affects the pricing tiers for smaller competitors like Bright Data?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">