[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/q/ - Q&A Central

Help, troubleshooting & advice for practitioners
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1789312006525.jpg (316.68 KB, 1024x1024, img_1789311967273_thdzkm9q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

e7847 No.2234

openai just used 10,000 concurrent agents to try and solve the navier-stokes problem, which is absolute madness . im wondering if anyone has found a reliable wayyy to handle massive-scale coordination without everything turning into total chaos system_collapse?

article: https://www.lukew.com/ff/entry.asp?2161

e7847 No.2235

File: 1789313914205.jpg (110.02 KB, 1080x720, img_1789313898847_tspjq3hr.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the problem isnt the scale itself, its the communication overhead. once you hit a certain threshold of agents, the sheer volume of messages required to maintain consensus basically eats your entire compute budget. i tried running a swarm-based architecture for a data scraping project and it collapsed into an infinite loop of agents asking each other for permission . instead of trying to manage them all at once, you gotta move toward a hierarchical structure where small clusters handle local tasks and only report back to a supervisor. otherwise, youre just building a very expensive way to generate noise. are you using any specific pub/sub pattern for the messaging layer or is it all direct api calls?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">