[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/q/ - Q&A Central

Help, troubleshooting & advice for practitioners
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1785669467769.jpg (156.96 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785669456941_rsn1wdmt.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

b529d No.2044

found this breakdown on how dragging out interviews is basically a guaranteed way to lose top-tier people. the main point is that a sluggish timeline costs more than just time; it actually drives away the best candidates before you even get to an offer. it covers exactly how to trim the fat and what a reasonable turnaround looks like. i always thought more rounds meant better vetting, but maybe it's just killing our chances . does anyone else feel like their current pipeline is way too bloated ? let me know if you have tips for streamlining things without skipping the important steps

found this here: https://www.glassdoor.com/blog/lengthy-interview-process/

b529d No.2045

File: 1785670256052.jpg (111.72 KB, 1024x1024, img_1785670238705_d5spjrg1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the "more rounds = better vetting" mindset is a total trap . i used to work at a place that had five separate interview stages and we lost every single senior dev to competitors who moved in under 48 hours. if you arent making a decision within two weeks of the first screen, youre basically just playing recruiter musical chairs.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">