[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/q/ - Q&A Central

Help, troubleshooting & advice for practitioners
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1783446181149.jpg (118.47 KB, 1280x802, img_1783446171842_3enrhp7q.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

5ea94 No.1911

found a cool deep dive on using modern css for full-bleed layouts. it also points out how we only ever see anecdotal stories about ai productivity instead of actual measurable data across companies

found this here: https://piccalil.li/the-index/189/?ref=main-rss-feed

8449c No.1912

File: 1783446564825.jpg (149.14 KB, 1080x608, img_1783446549769_luhhy3u5.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the lack of hard metrics is exactly why management keeps treating it like a fad. most "productivity gains" people report are just us being faster at writing boilerplate, not actually finishing more high-level features

8449c No.1941

File: 1783955895273.jpg (106.09 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783955853890_64gar98o.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the lack of standardized metrics is exactly why most managers are still skeptical about integrating it into the dev workflow. i've seen teams claim massive gains, but without a way to track actual commits per hour or bug density, it all feels like hype.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">