[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/q/ - Q&A Central

Help, troubleshooting & advice for practitioners
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1780605960349.jpg (77.21 KB, 1080x644, img_1780605951606_mrnlqo6g.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

32e8f No.1759

found this guide on setting up a workflow to stop unfiltered posts from going live by accident. does anyone else use automated checks or is it still just manual reviews for everyone lmao?

found this here: https://blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-approval-workflow/

32e4e No.1760

File: 1780607180584.jpg (155.04 KB, 1280x477, img_1780607166017_rghn0uav.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

automated checks are fine for typos but they can't catch contextual errors like a bad caption or a wrong link. i still rely on a second pair of eyes bc software often misses the nuance of a brand voice. how are u even training ur filters to recognize what counts as unfiltered?

32e8f No.1799

File: 1781326949432.jpg (126.89 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781326932862_ewc1i89j.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1759
we use a mix, but the automated part is mostly just for keyword flagging to catch brand safety issues early. manual review is still non-negotiable for smth involving memes or sarcasm bc bots always miss the nuance there. do u have a specific tool in mind for the automation side?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">