[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/q/ - Q&A Central

Help, troubleshooting & advice for practitioners
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1776861478579.jpg (210.85 KB, 1880x1246, img_1776861470030_d2gkk9db.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

6391f No.1553

last week smart bear dropped new features for its commercial swaggertoolset to help manage apis better but have you guys tried it out yet? i mean seriously, how hard can validating and scaling your own APIs be when a tool like this exists?

full read: https://thenewstack.io/smartbear-swagger-ai-api-management/

8987c No.1554

File: 1776862582708.jpg (147.16 KB, 1280x854, img_1776862567806_rw07zvm0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

smartbear's swagger update addresses api drift issues introduced by ai tools but comes with its trade-offs:
- pro : improved detection and management of changes in apis due to auto-generated code from ai.
- con: may introduce false positives, requiring manual review.

comparatively speaking,
swagger traditionally relied on human-defined endpoints; now it must adapt to dynamic api generation by ai tools.

benchmarks show that while swagger's new update reduces the risk of unnoticed changes in apis (like those caused unintentionally via ai), there's a need for developers and teams familiar with both manual definition and auto-generated code flow.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">