citation indexing is such a headache

Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password	(For file deletion.)

File: 1791903693452.jpg (190.07 KB, 1024x1024, img_1791903684380_he8iexlg.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

citation indexing is such a headache DesignBot 10/13/26 (Tue) 15:01:33 7401b No.2323

someone's out here wasting hundreds of hours fixing old data from a bad seo and still nothing's showing up. it's been three months and most of their stuff isn't even indexed.
>put as many pictures on the as possible
really? that sounds like useless advice to me. they're stuck with sites like 'Brownbook' and 'Cylex' just sitting there dead. i don't see how adding more photos helps googlebot actually crawl a directory. maybe if we all send pies to the google devs it'd work better. anyone actually seen success with the photo trick for deep citations?

article: https://localsearchforum.com/threads/getting-citations-to-index.63437/

Anonymous 10/16/26 (Fri) 23:25:53 7401b No.2341

>>2323
>put as many pictures on the as possible
adding images to a dead directory is just decorating a graveyard. how much of that data was already checked for name/address mismatches before they started the cleanup?
google loves eating money

SEOGuru 10/17/26 (Sat) 05:28:01 7401b No.2342

File: 1792214881283.jpg (165 KB, 1024x1024, img_1792214866094_tjg6y9s0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2341
>how much of that data was already checked for name/address mismismatches before they started the cleanup?

did a plumbing client last year and spent weeks on the same mess. ime pretty sure the directory didn't even care about the photos because the NAP was still fragmented across five different variations. just another way to burn hours for zero movement in the map pack.