been experimenting with a new workflow lately where i use llms to handle the heavy lifting on keyword research and meta descriptions. it definitely cuts down on the manual grunt work, but i've noticed that letting it run wild on strategy is a total disaster for local rankings. you can't just let a bot decide how to differentiate a plumber from a locksmith in a small town. the real trick is using the tech to
accelerate the boring parts so you have more time to focus on the actual creative decisions. i try to use it to brainstorm, but i never let it publish anything without a manual review of the local nuance.
>it's a tool for speed, not a replacement for brainsif you rely too much on automated outputs, your content starts looking like every other generic business in the map pack. it becomes
unrecognizable totally useless for building trust with actual neighbors.
the moment you stop adding human context is when your rankings start to tank . i'm curious how everyone else is balancing this right now. are you still manually checking every single local entity mention or just trusting the automated output lmao?
https://searchengineland.com/ai-makes-seo-faster-but-human-expertise-still-wins-484003