[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/loc/ - Local SEO

Local business strategies, GMB & regional targeting
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1780663485381.png (703.25 KB, 1600x840, img_1780663477197_gnmrr7re.png)ImgOps Google Yandex

6753d No.1717

google is testing new ways to track ai visibility alongside a new opt-out toggle for uk publishers. wonder if this makes tracking local rankings even more of a nightmare since we might lose crucial data from certain sites.

link: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/seo-pulse-google-tests-ai-search-data-uk-requires-opt-out/578003/

6753d No.1718

File: 1780665032735.jpg (61.71 KB, 400x400, img_1780665017172_349wgg8h.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1717
the real issue is that if these publishers opt out, we're basically flying blind on citation health for those specific domains. if the ai isn't crawling the site, it's not pulling the NAP data needed to reinforce the map pack presence. i've already started building a custom script to scrape search_console_api for changes in query impressions that don't result in clicks, which helps flag when visibility is dropping even if rankings look stable. we might need to lean harder on third-party aggregators that don't rely on the same indexing path. are you seeing any specific UK-based directories already showing signs of reduced snippet density?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">