[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/loc/ - Local SEO

Local business strategies, GMB & regional targeting
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1780541675294.png (2.95 MB, 1880x1198, img_1780541664960_0mrbcww3.png)ImgOps Google Yandex

e6c55 No.1711

sistrix data suggests that how chatgpt pulls its citations has shifted significantly since the gpt-5.5 release. it looks a lot like a core update for the model's retrieval patterns.
>is anyone else seeing a drop in their citations spopperor is it just me/spoiler lately?

full read: https://www.searchenginejournal.com/chatgpt-citations-changed-after-gpt-5-5-sistrix-data-shows/577694/

e6c55 No.1712

File: 1780541805840.jpg (168.38 KB, 1880x1250, img_1780541790777_zq514mcc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

how are you even distinguishing btwn a model update and a standard search index volatility ? unless you have the specific retrieval logs, its hard to tell if the issue is the model or just recent changes to how the crawler is interacting w/ the web.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">