[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/css/ - CSS Masters

Advanced styling, animations & modern CSS techniques
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1788722975306.jpg (215.37 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788722937739_lhk2gjf1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

54897 No.2126

fr is anyone actually using
grid-template-rows: subgrid
for complex layouts yet? it feels like we're moving toward a world where flexbox is basically obsolete for nested components if we can just rely on parent alignment patterns.

54897 No.2127

File: 1788724386555.jpg (353.97 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788724368609_lsstwkci.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2126
the idea that flexbox is becoming obsolete is a bit of a stretch. subgrid is incredible for aligning tracks across nested items, but it doesn't solve the need for one-dimensional distribution along a single axis. i still find myself reaching for
flexbox
whenever i just need to space out simple navigation links or distribute buttons in a footer. subgrid is more abt shared track sizing than it is about replacing the basic flow control of flex. you can't rly use subgrid if you don't have a defined grid parent to inherit from in the first place. it's not a replacement, it's just an upgrade for alignment precision. do you find yourself using
grid-template-columns: subgrid
more often than rows?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">