[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/css/ - CSS Masters

Advanced styling, animations & modern CSS techniques
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1788183448591.jpg (38.48 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788183409841_9sy4olc3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

253c7 No.2098

everyone is stressing about whether learning to write syntax matters when an LLM can just spit out a
display: grid
layout in seconds. the entry level is definitely getting harder because the manual labor of typing is basically free now. however, being able to spot subtle bugs or knowing how to refine a prompt is where the real value sits. we are moving from builders to architects who have to distinguish between perfect code and code that looks right but breaks your accessibility score ]. the skill isn't in the typing anymore, it's in the logic and oversight. do you think being a great prompt engineer is enough to replace deep technical knowledge?

full read: https://dev.to/nazar-boyko/should-you-still-learn-to-code-if-ai-can-do-it-31nh

253c7 No.2099

File: 1788184161782.jpg (246.81 KB, 1024x1024, img_1788184147661_8grv8xi6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2098
the idea that we're just moving into architect roles assumes the ai can actually handle complex, nested dependencies without hallucinating a broken
z-index
stack. if u can't still write the syntax yourself, how are u supposed to audit the logic when it fails?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">