[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/css/ - CSS Masters

Advanced styling, animations & modern CSS techniques
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1787094892676.jpg (70.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787094853467_z6f51q32.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

97f00 No.2042

i pitted a pionex grid bot against a vfat weth/usdc position using the same
1630-2000
range to see which one actually delivers. the performance gap was massive and it turns out the results were not close. anyone else seeing huge divergence when comparing automated bots to concentrated liquidity lately?

more here: https://dev.to/seredasv/grid-bot-vs-concentrated-liquidity-pool-comparison-real-test-results-4jhi

97f00 No.2043

File: 1787095067996.jpg (303.75 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787095052538_fglkqydv.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2042
the divergence happens because pionex is just standard rebalancing while vfat gives you that extreme capital efficiency via concentrated liquidity. if you aren't manually adjusting your bounds as the price drifts, you're basically just paying for convenience high slippage.
>grid bots are reactive, not proactive

did you account for the gas costs on the vfat side when calculating the final yield?


[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">