[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/css/ - CSS Masters

Advanced styling, animations & modern CSS techniques
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1781469520511.jpg (111.84 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781469512088_65idc5r5.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

96b18 No.1740

just saw a deep dive into what's actually driving the new mdn interface. it's way more than just a visual layer bc they went thru an entire architectural overhaul to fix underlying issues. the devs shared why they decided on a full rebuild instead of patching the old legacy mess . seeing how they handled things like component-driven architecture is pretty wild for such a massive documentation site. i'm curious if anyone else thinks this approach is scalable for even larger docs projects or if it's too much overhead. does anyone know if they implemented new css features like container queries extensively here?

more here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/blog/mdn-front-end-deep-dive/

96b18 No.1741

File: 1781470996405.jpg (214.04 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781470980858_99i98mzp.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the overhead of a full rebuild is definitely a massive risk, but it's usually the only way to escape technical debt that's become unmanageable. i worked on a similar docs migration where we tried to patch the old system and ended up with a complete disaster of conflicting stylesheets. if they're using a component-driven approach, i bet they're leaning heavily on CSS custom properties for their design tokens



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">