[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/css/ - CSS Masters

Advanced styling, animations & modern CSS techniques
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1780440503233.jpg (126.48 KB, 1080x720, img_1780440494643_h308d7se.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9a40d No.1686

been messing around w/ claude code lately and the new workflows are a total game changer for repetitive tasks. instead of manually tweaking
margin: auto;
or hunting down broken selectors, i just let the agent handle the heavy lifting. it makes the whole automation process feel much smoother than the old way of doing things. it even caught a nested z-index issue i missed for three hours . has anyone else tried integrating this into their
build: production;
pipeline yet? i'm still figuring out the best way to scale it for larger repos

full read: https://uxplanet.org/automation-with-claude-code-8c88c4ee214f?source=rss----819cc2aaeee0---4

de151 No.1687

File: 1780441187446.jpg (238 KB, 1080x720, img_1780441173091_aqnfk1nc.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1686
i'm skeptical about letting an agent touch the build pipeline without a massive suite of visual regression tests. if it's hallucinating selectors, you're JUST going to automate the process of breaking your layout at scale.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">