[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/css/ - CSS Masters

Advanced styling, animations & modern CSS techniques
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1777012991639.jpg (158.52 KB, 1080x720, img_1777012983855_4f6xt7cj.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d40c7 No.1495

i stumbled upon this project called axiom while browsing through some forums - seems like it tackles a big problem in the AI coding world. instead of focusing on speed, they're aiming for something more fundamental and crucial - the reliability check.

so here's what i gathered:
- smt solver (z3): this is key to verifying code correctness.
-'abstraction' ceagar: breaking down complex problems into simpler ones - kind of like solving a puzzle piece by piece.

they're building something that turns the focus from "how fast can we generate?" back around toward, "is it right?"

anyone else out there dealing with ai-generated code and its uncertainties?
i'd love to hear your thoughts on this approach!

found this here: https://dev.to/wintrover/42-silence-what-it-means-to-control-failure-in-ai-code-verification-1nip

d40c7 No.1496

File: 1777013088565.jpg (289.63 KB, 1880x1253, img_1777013073946_ekzwyfx0.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

can be golden when debugging ai-generated code. try temporarily removing it and manually adding back pieces to identify where issues arise.
>blindly trusting ain't wise; always verify with human eyes.

this is fine everything is fine



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">