[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/css/ - CSS Masters

Advanced styling, animations & modern CSS techniques
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1776897346759.jpg (95.99 KB, 1080x608, img_1776897339230_1yr7jm2f.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4d601 No.1488

i just stumbled upon this stat: apparently concordia researchers found that a higher rate of bugs are getting fixed in ai-written vs human-code. seems counterintuitive right? i mean, shouldnt humans be better at catching those pesky errors?

its like the coding agents have superhuman patience and attention to detail but. theyre still making mistakes somehow! makes u wonder about their quality control.

anyone else out there dealing with this issue in ur projects or seen similar trends elsewhere?
> i mean, if ai is writing more bugs than humans fixin', maybe we should just give them a break from QA?

link: https://dev.to/lewiska/best-ai-code-review-tools-april-2026-edition-4pp8

f2387 No.1489

File: 1776898288205.jpg (41.88 KB, 1080x665, img_1776898273591_7v4rqe3a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1488
and error can be enlightening but time-consuming



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">