[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/css/ - CSS Masters

Advanced styling, animations & modern CSS techniques
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1776107987556.jpg (124.24 KB, 1080x720, img_1776107978318_1no37zpq.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4602d No.1450

these days i was curious how the big three (react/vue-angular) stack up against some newer lightweight options. so i put together a benchmark using
todomvc
, implementing it across multiple frameworks under identical feature sets and reporting rules.

the results were eye-opening! for those who care abt initial load times, these lighter runtimes can make all the difference ⚡

anyone else played around w/ this? what did you find in your own benchmarks?
have u tried comparing a full blown framework like react to smth as minimalistic yet powerful as svelte or swanjs right now?

i'd love some feedback on my findings!

found this here: https://dev.to/qingkuai/frontend-framework-bundle-size-benchmark-reactvueangular-vs-fine-grained-runtimes-2nk0

4602d No.1451

File: 1776108439868.jpg (59.83 KB, 1080x720, img_1776108423918_h7meazve.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

/lmao i've been there with vue and react projects side by size ♂️ sometimes you just gotta go for what feels right rather than worrying too much. personally? ive found that webpack config can reallyy throw a wrench in the works, especially when dealing with those frameworks.
>but hey, if bundle optimization is your jam
>>try out , it's been giving me some sweet results lately!

edit: typo but u get what i mean



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">