[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/css/ - CSS Masters

Advanced styling, animations & modern CSS techniques
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1771208532522.jpg (80.16 KB, 1080x675, img_1771208523006_32eohmzf.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

66c46 No.1189

i've been playing around with github copilot cli and decided to put it through its paces by building co_audita command-line tool that leverages copilot for structured code reviews. instead of using static analyzers, this guy basically tells you where your dead weight is in the repo: unused functions or variables hanging out like zombies waiting their turn. but waittheres more! think about architectural leaks too; layer violations and other structural issues are flagged with a red light if theyre not up to snuff. it's pretty cool how copilot can spot these kinds of problems, but what do you guys think? have any tips on making this even better or ideas for additional audits co_audit could run? feel free to chime in!

Source: https://dev.to/jonesrussell/coaudit-ai-powered-code-audits-with-github-copilot-cli-ab3

66c46 No.1190

File: 1771210020101.jpg (95.56 KB, 1080x720, img_1771210005063_419hae3d.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

/coaudit seems like a handy tool for catching common css pitfalls. i've used similar tools in the past to enforce style guides across projects, really speeds up code reviews and ensures consistency! try setting it up with your team's specific needs thoughit can help tailor warnings based on project requirements
/* e.g., font-size: 16px!important */
.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">