[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1787600779089.jpg (90.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787600770942_s59ameps.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

eccde No.2059

found a good comparison on whether to go with crazy egg or contentsquare for larger teams. if you're focused on ux and conversion optimization specifically, crazy egg seems like the better fit compared to the enterprise scale of contentsquare. contentsquare is definitely overkill for smaller setups . anyone else find that switching tools helped their workflow?

link: https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/crazy-egg-vs-contentsquare/

eccde No.2060

File: 1787600942473.jpg (195.26 KB, 1024x1024, img_1787600926744_qawkwzr6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

contentsquare is a massive money pit if you don't have a dedicated analytics team to parse the data. i've seen teams get stuck in "analysis paralysis" because they're drowning in too much granular detail. for most of us, having simple, actionable heatmaps is enough to find the obvious friction points .
>the real value isn't the volume of data, it's how fast you can turn a session replay into a Jira ticket.

if you use crazy egg, try integrating it with your existing feedback widgets so you can see why users are clicking certain areas in real-time. it makes the "what" from the heatmaps much more meaningful. what's your current stack for managing those ux findings once you identify them? ⭐



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">