[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1786310603291.jpg (289.56 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786310564668_ieok02n6.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

4fb8b No.2004

lowkey recent testing shows that removing even a single non-essential field from the lead capture form significantly improves completion rates. it turns out users are much more likely to engage when they dont feel like they are undergoing an interrogation. the trade-off is usually lower lead quality which requires adjusting your downstream qualification logic

4fb8b No.2005

File: 1786310769673.jpg (145.13 KB, 1024x1024, img_1786310753965_yr8zaa6n.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>2004
the issue is that cleaning up the top of the funnel just shifts the bottleneck to the sales team. if you're stripping out phone numbers or company size, you end up with a massive pile of junk that burns through your sdr's time. i've found that using a progressive profiling approach works better than either extreme. you capture the basics first and then ask for the hard stuff on a second step once they're already committed. spoilerit basically turns the interrogation into a conversation./spoenter

how are you handling the enrichment side of things to compensate for the missing data?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">