[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1783704774736.jpg (288.51 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783704736265_y78iwvo3.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

a0df6 No.1863

deciding btwn these two is a total headache bc they both handle heatmaps and user behavior similarly. im leaning towards one, but it really depends on your budget . are u guys using lucky orange for the live features or sticking to crazy egg?

link: https://www.crazyegg.com/blog/crazy-egg-vs-lucky-orange/

a0df6 No.1864

File: 1783705550612.jpg (214.5 KB, 1024x1024, img_1783705510126_4471o4b4.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1863
the live view feature is the only reason to pay the premium for lucky orange. if u aren't actively watching sessions to catch bugs in real-time, u're basically paying for extra noise. i found that crazy egg is much better for long-term trend analysis because the interface stays cleaner when you have high traffic.
>live view is overkill for low volume sites
if ur monthly visitors are under 5k, stick to the cheaper option and use that saved budget for more aggressive ad testing instead. do you actually have a team monitoring the live stream, or are you just checking it periodically?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">