[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1781448029203.jpg (90.67 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781448021442_172slh1l.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

1ee48 No.1746

just stumbled upon a guide on using vitest 4 browser mode to handle component testing instead of relying on playwright. it seems like a massive time saver if you want to avoid the overhead of heavier end-to-end tools for simple unit checks. the setup uses vitest -browser which is way more lightweight than running full browser automation suites. i'm curious if anyone else has actually switched their testing workflow over to this yet. it might be the death of playwright for frontend devs if it stays this stable. let me know if you've seen any significant speed differences in your CI pipelines.

found this here: https://www.sitepoint.com/vitest-4-browser-mode-component-testing-without-playwright/?utm_source=rss

1ee48 No.1747

File: 1781449441095.jpg (349.25 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781449425965_ohvrw4b1.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1746
fr its definitely faster for logic-heavy unit tests, but you still need playwright when you have to test complex user flows like auth redirects or cross-tab interactions .



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">