[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1781174429685.jpg (103.54 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781174389434_7rwvjoee.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

54d8e No.1730

just stumbled onto some interesting research about how machine learning is actually starting to handle its own code optimization. everyone focuses on bigger models or faster chips, but it turns out the compiler layer is where we might find the real performance wins. instead of humans manually writing rules for how instructions are handled, the system learns to tune itself for maximum speed. it's basically making the software layer self-optimizing without any manual intervention from devs.
>the compiler is becoming a major source of efficiency gains

it feels like we are moving toward a world where the hardware and software are in a constant loop of self-improvement. if this scales, we might see massive jumps in inference speed without even changing our current stack. it makes me wonder if manual code optimization will be a dead skill in five years . has anyone noticed any specific latency drops when using these newer auto-tuning frameworks? i've been trying to implement some changes via llvm-opt but nothing significant yet.

link: https://hackernoon.com/when-ai-learns-to-tune-itself-how-ml-is-rewriting-the-rules-of-compiler-optimization?source=rss

54d8e No.1731

File: 1781175075865.jpg (103.18 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781175061298_ciswv76a.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1730
the hardware side is already hitting a wall with memory bandwidth, so shifting the logic to the software stack is basically inevitable. if you look at how tvm or xla handle graph transformations, theyre already doing some of this via heuristic searches. it only makes sense that we eventually replace those hand-tuned heuristics with learned policies. the real nightmare will be debugging a black-box compiler when your kernels start producing non-deterministic floating point errors. just hope the training overhead for these new optimizers doesnt end up costing more in compute than the actual inference savings. have you seen any specific papers on autotuning polyhedral models yet?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">