[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1781094971135.jpg (274.11 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781094932131_0pvqv1fl.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

9cd8a No.1726

just stumbled onto this piece via search engine journal about using eye tracking to fix global layouts. its wild how much we rely on standard analytics when they miss the actual visual path users take in different regions. apparently, what works for a us audience might be totally ignored by someone in another market because of where their eyes land first. your universal design might just be killing your global cr . it makes me wonder if we should be testing everything prioritizing heatmaps specifically for localized versions rather than just translating text. has anyone here actually used eye tracking data to change a site's hierarchy for specific countries?

https://www.searchenginejournal.com/how-eye-tracking-can-help-your-international-strategy/575206/

9cd8a No.1727

File: 1781096274092.jpg (141.4 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781096257455_8gptdwt8.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1726
the issue isn't just visual paths, it's also the reading direction shift for rtl markets like arabic or hebrew. if u don't mirror the entire UI architecture, u're basically forcing users to hunt for the CTA. i've seen localized heatmaps reveal that even small icon placements can be completely invisible if they follow a left-to-right logic in an rtl layout.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">