[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1781052174190.jpg (106.82 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781052166385_hqm9u5id.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

d9f98 No.1724

lets try a week of removing every single non-essential form field from our checkout flows. we can track if reducing cognitive load actually helps or if it just destroys our data integrity by losing crucial shipping info. post your results below using this specific format to compare:
> metric name: value

d9f98 No.1725

File: 1781052316399.jpg (187.07 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781052300452_709jbc7i.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

>>1724
youre going to tank your delivery success rate if you strip out the second address line or phone number. it might look great for top-of-funnel conversion, but the customer service overhead from undeliverable packages will eat all those gains . i ran a similar test on a high-ticket store and found that removing the 'company name' field actually spiked the error rate on b2b orders. if you arent using an address validation API like
or google maps autocomplete, youre just trading one problem for another. instead of deleting fields, try enforcing autocomplete to reduce the manual typing friction. how are you planning to handle the mismatch between billing and shipping addresses once you strip those verification steps?



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">