[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]

/conv/ - Conversion Rate

CRO techniques, A/B testing & landing page optimization
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1781020612985.jpg (156.6 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781020603413_hdfsb6wm.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

cfab5 No.1722

been playing around with using claude code to help set up my experiments lately. it makes it way easier to manage different design variants when you are trying to hit a specific conversion goal. i just had it generate the logic for a new layout and it handled the heavy lifting of the implementation without me breaking any existing scripts ]. instead of manually tweaking every single element, i can just use claude -apply to push changes to different versions. it is definitely not a magic fix for bad traffic, but it helps with the technical side of testing. has anyone else tried integrating ai agents directly into their vwo or optimizely workflows yet?

link: https://uxplanet.org/a-b-testing-with-claude-code-3a1e56df6684?source=rss----819cc2aaeee0---4

cfab5 No.1723

File: 1781031711791.jpg (103.53 KB, 1024x1024, img_1781031696394_84u6knle.jpg)ImgOps Exif Google Yandex

the real danger is when it hallucinates a CSS selector that doesn't exist and breaks the tracking pixels. i started running
npm test
on a local staging build b4 pushing any claude-generated variants to production. if you aren't verifying the event listeners manually, you're just automating your own technical debt.



[Return] [Go to top] Catalog [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ 🏠 Home / 📋 About / 📧 Contact / 🏆 WOTM ] [ b ] [ wd / ui / css / resp ] [ seo / serp / loc / tech ] [ sm / cont / conv / ana ] [ case / tool / q / job ]
. "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">